How many people reproduce




















Even with these hideous risks in mind, if the survivors had enough children the chances are at least some of them would be healthy. But what happens when inbreeding continues for hundreds of years?

And with nine generations of strategic marriages between cousins, uncles, and nieces in years, the Spanish Habsburgs are a natural experiment in how it all adds up. As an adult his infertility spelled the extinction of an entire dynasty.

In a team of Spanish scientists revealed why. Despite plenty of food and protection from predators, the kakapo might not make it. Endangered species also run the gauntlet of longer-term risks. Although they may already be well adapted to their environment, genetic diversity allows species to evolve their way around future challenges. Nowhere is this more important than immunity. Even if our species makes it, it could be unrecognisable.

Not only would the new humans look and sound different — they could be an entirely different species. The European royal familes of the 19th Century were living proof of the perils of inbreeding Credit: Science Photo Library.

So how much variety do you need? Increasingly, the concept is leading those in the field to question the policies of large conservation charities, which prioritise the most endangered species.

It can be used to say well, can we forget about species? These two graphs show the number of men left and women right who reproduced throughout human history. Chart: Monika Karmin et al. Physically driven natural selection shaped many human traits. Ethnic Africans and Europeans had to evolve to digest milk , for example, while most ethnic Tibetans have adaptations to deal with the lower oxygen levels at high altitudes. But if Wilson Sayres' team's hypothesis is correct, it would be one of the first instances that scientists have found of culture affecting human evolution.

The team uncovered this dip-and-rise in the male-to-female reproductive ratio by looking at DNA from more than volunteers from seven world regions. These don't make up a large portion of a person's genetics, but they're special because people inherit Y-chromosome DNA exclusively from their male ancestors and mitochondrial DNA exclusively from their female ancestors. By analyzing diversity in these parts, scientists are able to deduce the numbers of female and male ancestors a population has.

It's always more female. This development stopped in and a subsequent decline was observed through to a relative low in , followed by a slight increase up to and another decrease since. In , the total fertility rate in the EU was 1.

In , 4. For comparison, the EU crude birth rate was During the period —, the highest annual total for the number of live births in the EU was recorded in , at 6.

From this relative high up to the beginning of the 21st century, the number of live births in the EU declined at a relatively steady pace, reaching a low of 4. This was followed by a modest rebound in the number of live births, with a high of 4.

The most widely used indicator of fertility is the total fertility rate: this is the mean number of children that would be born alive to a woman during her lifetime if she were to pass through her childbearing years conforming to the age-specific fertility rates of a given year. A total fertility rate of around 2. A total fertility rate below 1. The total fertility rate is comparable across countries since it takes into account changes in the size and structure of the population.

Figure 3 shows that the mean age of women at childbirth continued to rise between and , from an average of One partial explanation for the increase in the total fertility rate is that it may have been related to a catching-up process: following the trend to give birth later in life witnessed by the increase in the mean age of women at childbirth , the total fertility rate might have declined first, before a subsequent recovery. An increase in the mean age of women at birth of first child can also be observed, from a value of Indeed, women in the EU appear to be having fewer children while they are young, and more children later.

Figure 4 shows the growing relevance of fertility at ages higher than 30 in the EU. While the fertility rates of women aged less than 30 in the EU have declined since , those of women aged 30 and over have risen. I know now that we can survive on what we earn as a family and still go on holiday every year. If we had more than one child we couldn't go on holiday. We'd rather give our daughter the best of everything than have multiple children that we can just about feed and clothe.

My partner and I are also thinking about the future. We want to be in a position where we can help her financially with university or housing. I don't want to ever have to say that she can't go to a party or have a new Christmas jumper. The fall in fertility rate is not down to sperm counts or any of the things that normally come to mind when thinking of fertility.

In many ways, falling fertility rates are a success story. Without migration, countries will face ageing and shrinking populations. Dr George Leeson, director of the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, says that does not have to be a bad thing, as long as the whole of society adjusts to the massive demographic change.

He told the BBC: "Demography impacts on every single aspect of our lives, just look out of your window at the people on the streets, the houses, the traffic, the consumption, it is all driven by demography. He thinks workplaces are going to have to change and even the idea of retiring at 68, the current maximum in the UK, will be unsustainable.

The report, part of the Global Burden of Diseases analysis, says affected countries will need to consider increasing immigration, which can create its own problems, or introducing policies to encourage women to have more children, which often fail. Report author Prof Murray argues: "On current trends there will be very few children and lots of people over the age of 65 and that's very difficult to sustain global society. But while the change may challenge societies, it may also have environmental benefits given the impact of our species.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000